Yes! magazine doesn’t follow the simple path of conventional wisdom. Rather than indulge in clichés about mythical dodo-like “job creators,” it asks how our economy needs to change in order to generate a more stable economy in a time when we all need to be conservative in the greenest sense of that word: buying from local/regional markets, learning how to grow food and fix things, and working less/living more.
I love these solutions. But something radical would have to change in our society for this blueprint to work. Many people work so hard that they can’t fix things. They don’t even have time (in many cases, the income) to shop at a farmers market. Too many Americans have fallen in love with Wal-mart and the promise of cheaper, cheaper, cheaper. What they fail to realize is that corporations and business owners are applying a similar philosophy to how they will pay working people. Until we have a stable labor market that will allow the middle class and working poor to build wealth, we will look at a world where 22% of American children live in poverty. That’s unacceptable.
What to Do about the Jobs Crisis
Tags: sustainability, Yes magazine
Yesterday I wrote that the panic caused by a job growth of 54,000 was overblown. My point was that we should not live by fear. There is a jobs problem. How do we solve it?
Yes! magazine offers an outline of changes that will be fleshed out in their next issue. What Yes! does as well as any journal is challenge conventional wisdom. It condemns the tired ideas of both the right (cut deficits) and left (make jobs) in favor of creating an economy built around sustainability and a new model for sharing wealth. Yes! asks how we can:
Agree or disagree, Yes! presents an alternative to traditional solutions. We see everything in terms of right and left (and sometimes a vague middle). This kind of proposal might not work, but it presents a different way of solving a problem, which is what we need in the face of a weak economy and a changing world.